4枚与3枚空心钉固定PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

段强民,主治医师,研究方向:创伤骨科,骨关节外科,(电话)13589497940,(电子信箱)nanhai44021@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.42

基金项目:


Comparison of four versus three cannulated screws for internal fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的] 比较 4 枚与 3 枚空心钉内固定 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的临床效果。[方法] 2014 年 1 月—2018 年 11 月, 70 例 Pauwels III 型股骨颈骨折患者纳入本研究,采用抽签法将患者随机分为两组。其中,35 例采用 4 枚空心钉内固定 (四钉组),35 例采用 3 枚空心钉内固定(三钉组),比较两组患者围手术期情况、随访结果和影像资料。[结果]两组患者均顺利完成手术,术中未见血管及神经损伤。四钉组手术时间、术中出血量、切口总长度和术中透视时间均显著大于三钉组 (P< 0.05)。但是,两组住院天数和恢复下地行走时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访 18~48 个月,平均(26.41±5.02)个月。至末次随访时,因股骨头坏死或骨不连行全髋置换,四钉组为 5/35 (14.26%),三钉组为 7/35 (20.00%)。随术后时间推移,两组患者髋关节各向 ROM 均显著增加 (P<0.05),Harris 评分显著增加 (P<0.05)。相应时间点,四钉组各向髋 ROM 和 Harris 评分均显著优于三钉组 (P<0.05)。影像方面,两组患者骨折复位质量的差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。但是,四钉组股骨头颈短缩和颈干角均显著优于三钉组 (P<0.05)。[结论] 4 枚空心钉固定 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折临床效果优于 3 枚空心钉固定。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of four versus three cannulated screws for internal fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. [Methods] From January 2014 to November 2018, 70 patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture were en- rolled in this study and randomly divided into two groups by lottery. Among them, 35 patients had fractures fixed with 4 cannulated screws (the four-screw group) , while the remaining 35 patients were treated with 3 cannulated screws (the three-screw group). Perioperative condi- tions, follow-up consequences and imaging data were compared between the two groups. [Results] All the patients in both groups had inter- nal fixations performed successfully with no vascular and nerve injury. The four-screw group consumed significantly longer operative time, associated with significantly more intraoperative bleeding, total incision length and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency than the threescrew group (P<0.05) . However, there were no significant differences in hospital stay and the time to resume walking between the two groups (P>0.05) . The follow-up period lasted for 18 to 48 months with a mean of (26.41±5.02) months. To the latest follow-up, total hip ar- throplasty due to femoral head necrosis or nonunion was performed 5/35 (14.26%) in the four-screw group, whereas 7/35 (20.00%) in the three- screw group. The hip range of motion (ROM) in all directions and the Harris score was significantly increased over time in both groups (P<0.05) . At all the corresponding time points, the four-screw group proved significantly superior to the three-screw group in terms of ROMs and Harris scores (P<0.05) . With respect to radiographic evaluation, there was no significant difference in fracture reduction qual- ity in term of Garden's alignment index between the two groups (P>0.05) . However, the four-screw group was significantly superior to the three- screw group in terms of femoral head and neck shortening and neck- shaft angle (P<0.05) . [Conclusion] The four cannulated screws used in internal fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture does achieve better clinical outcomes than the three canulated screws.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

段强民,李光磊,张冰,等. 4枚与3枚空心钉固定PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30 (2): 113-118. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.02.04.
DUAN Qiang-min, LI Guang-lei, ZHANG Bing, et al. Comparison of four versus three cannulated screws for internal fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2022, 30 (2): 113-118. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.02.04.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13
  • 最后修改日期:2021-11-11
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-10
  • 出版日期: