微创经椎间孔椎体间融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

魏见伟,主治医师,研究方向:脊柱外科,(电话)15866889899,(电子信箱)spisur@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687

基金项目:


Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的] 探讨微创经椎间孔椎间融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱 (degenerative spondylolisthesis, DS) 的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析 2016 年 4 月—2018 年 12 月本院收治的 101 例单节段 DS 患者的临床资料,根据医患沟通结果,53 例采用微创经椎间孔椎间融合术 (微创组),48 例行开放 TLIF 手术 (开放组)。比较两组围手术期、随访与影像资料。[结果] 两组患者均顺利完成手术,两组手术时间的差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。微创组切口总长度、术中失血量、术后引流量、术后下地时间和住院时间均显著优于开放组 (P<0.05)。所有患者均获随访,平均随访时间 (28.32±9.65) 个月。随着时间推移,两组 VAS 和 ODI 评分均显著减少(P<0.05)。术后 6 个月及末次随访时,两组 VAS 评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但末次随访时微创组 ODI 评分明显优于开放组(P<0.05)。影像方面,与术前相比,术后两组的椎体间隙高度均显著增加(P<0.05),而椎体滑脱百分比均显著减小 (P<0.05)。相应时间点,两组上述影像指标的差异均无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。[结论] 与开放性手术相比,微创经椎间孔椎间融合治疗单节段退行性滑脱可减少医源性创伤,促进术后恢复。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) . [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on a total of 101 patients who were admitted to ourhospital from April 2016 to December 2018 for single-segment DS. According to doctor-patient communication results, 53 patients under-went MIS-TLIF (MIS group) , while the other 48 patients underwent open TLIF surgery (open group) . The perioperative, follow-up and im-aging data of the two groups were compared. [Results] All patients in both groups had operation performed successfully without a signifi-cant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P>0.05) . However, the MIS group proved significantly superior to the opengroup in terms of total incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, time to resume ambulation and hospital stay (P<0.05) . As time went during follow up period lasted for (28.32±9.65) months on average, the VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly inboth groups (P<0.05) . There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at 6 months after surgery and the latest fol-low-up (P>0.05) , but ODI score of MIS group was significantly better than that of the open group at the latest follow-up (P<0.05) . Radio-graphically, the intervertebral space height increased significantly (P<0.05) , whereas the percentage of vertebral slippage significantly de-creased in both groups postoperatively compared with those preoperatively (P<0.05) . At any corresponding time points, there was no statis-tically significant differences in the above image indexes between the two groups (P>0.05) . [Conclusion] Minimally invasive transforami-nal lumbar fusion has benefits of minimizing iatrogenic trauma and facilitating postoperative recovery over the open counterpart for singlespace degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

魏见伟,姜良海,陈龙伟,等. 微创经椎间孔椎体间融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30 (7): 587-592. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.07.03.
WEI Jian-wei, JI? ANG Liang-hai, CHEN Long-wei, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2022, 30 (7): 587-592. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.07.03.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:2021-09-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-10
  • 出版日期: