弹性髓内钉与钢板治疗大龄儿童股骨转子下骨折
作者:
作者简介:

李飞,主治医师,研究方向:骨外科,(电话)15081919826,(电子信箱)tssdeyylf@163.com

中图分类号:

R683.42


Elastic stable intramedullary nail versus proximal femoral locking compression plate for femoral subtrochanteric fracture in old children
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [23]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 对比弹性髓内钉与股骨近端锁定加压钢板治疗大龄儿童股骨转子下骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析 2013 年 1 月—2018 年 1 月本院手术治疗儿童股骨转子下骨折 33 例患者的临床资料。根据骨折类型和器械适应证,18 例采用髓内钉固定,15 例采用钢板固定。比较两组患儿围手术期、随访与影像资料。[结果] 两组均顺利完成手术。髓内钉组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、住院天数均显著优于钢板组(P<0.05),但前者术中透视次数显著多于后者(P<0.05)。两组患儿术后均获随访 18 个月以上。两组下地行走时间及完全负重时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随术后时间推移,两组患者 ROM 和 Harris 评分均显著增加 (P<0.05)。术后相应时间点,髓内钉组 ROM 及 Harris 评分均高于钢板组,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,按改良的 Baumgaertner 标准,髓内钉组骨折复位质量显著不及钢板组(P<0.05),但是,髓内钉组骨折愈合时间显著早于钢板组(P<0.05)。[结论]弹性髓内钉及股骨近端锁定加压钢板治疗大龄儿童股骨转子下骨折均可取得良好临床疗效,内固定方式可根据各自适应证进行选择。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) versus proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) for femoral subtrochanteric fracture in old children. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 33 old children who received surgical treatment for femoral subtrochanteric fractures in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018. Based on the fracture type and instrument indication, 18 patients underwent ESIN, while the other 15 patients had fractures fixed with PFLCP. The documents regarding to perioperative period, follow-up and radiographs were compared between the two groups. [Results] All the patients in both groups had operation performed smoothly. The ESIN group proved significantly superior to the PFLCP group in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, and hospital days (P<0.05) , although the former had significantly greater intraoperative fluo- roscopic frequency than the latter (P<0.05) . The postoperative follow-up lasted for more than 18 months in the two groups. There were no significant differences in the time to return walking and the time to resume full-weight bearing activity between the two groups (P>0.05) . Both the hip extension-flexion range of motion (ROM) and Harris score significantly increased over time postoperatively in both groups (P< 0.05) . The ESIN group was superior to the PFLCP group in terms of ROM and Harris score postoperatively, whereas which proved not sta- tistically significant at any matching time point (P>0.05) . Regarding to radiographic assessment, the ESIN group was significantly inferior to the PFLCP group in term of fracture reduction quality based on Baumgaertner criteria (P<0.05) , however, the ESIN group got fracture healing significantly earlier than the PFLCP group (P<0.05) . [Conclusions] Both ESIN and PFLCP are effective for internal fixation of fem- oral subtrochanteric fractures in old children, which should be selected according to patient's concreate condition and the instrument indica- tions.

    参考文献
    [1] Jarvis J,Davidson D,Letts M.Management of subtrochanteric frac?tures in skeletally immature adolescents [J].J Trauma,2006,60(3):613-619.
    [2] Pombo MW,Shilt JS.The definition and treatment of pediatric sub?trochanteric femur fractures with titanium elastic nails [J].J Pedi?atr Orthop,2006,26(3):364-370.
    [3] Alluri RK,Sabour A,Heckmann N,et al.Increasing rate of surgi?cal fixation in four-and five-year-old children with femoral shaftfractures [J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2019,27(1):e24–e32.
    [4] Beebe KS,Sabharwal S,Behrens F.Femoral shaft fractures:is rig?id intramedullary nailing safe for adolescents [J].Am J Orthop,2006,35(4):172-174.
    [5] Paredes V,Franco A,Soto T,et al.A systematic review of rigidlocked intramedullary nail insertion sites and avascular necrosis ofthe femoral head in the skeletally immature [J].J Pediatr Orthop,2011,31(4):377-380.
    [6] Jr CS,Kim EJ,Koehler DM,et al.Twenty-year experience with rig?id intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in skeletally im?mature patients [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(13):1080-1089.
    [7] Jevsevar DS,Shea KG,Murray JN,et al.AAOS Clinical PracticeGuideline on the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2015,23(12):e101.
    [8] Gordon JE,Mehlman CT.The community orthopaedic surgeon tak?ing trauma call:pediatric femoral shaft fracture pearls and pitfalls[J].J Orthop Trauma,2017,31(Suppl 6):16-21.
    [9] Wainwright AM,Narayanan UG.A new technique for reduction ofpediatric femoral fractures using elastic stable intramedullary nails[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2007,89(4):432-434.
    [10] Baumgaertner M,Curtin S,Lindskog D,et al.The value of the tipapex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochantericfractures of the hip [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995,77:1058-1064.
    [11] Baumgaertner MR,Curtin SL,Lindskog DM.Intramedullary versusextramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hipfractures [J].Clin Orthop,1998,348(384):87-94.
    [12] Khoriati AA,Jones C,Gelfer Y,et al.The management of paediat?ric diaphyseal femoral fractures:a modern approach [J].StrategiesTrauma Limb Reconstr,2016,11(2):87-97.
    [13] Flynn JM,Hresko T,Reynolds RA,et a1.Titanium elastic nails forpediatric femur fractures:a multicenter study of early results withanalysis of complications [J].J Pediatr Orthop,2001,21(1):4-8.
    [14] 左玉明,于铁强,王月光,等.儿童髋部锁定加压钢板固定治疗学龄儿童股骨转子下骨折 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(4):310-313.
    [15] Jauquier N,Doerfler M,Haecker FM,et al.Immediate hip spica isas effective as but more efficient than flexible intramedullary nail?ing for femoral shaft fractures in preschool children [J].J Child Or?thop,2010,4(5):461-465.
    [16] Mathew WP,Jeffrey S.The definition and treatment of pediatricsubtrochanteric femur fractures with titanium elastic nail [J].Pedi?atr Orthop,2006,26(3):364-370.
    [17] 王侃,杨建平,张中礼,等.弹性钉加尾帽治疗儿童长度不稳定型股骨干骨折 [J].中华骨科杂志,2016,36(24):1606-1612.
    [18] Hernanz González Y,Díaz Martín A,Jara Sánchez F,et al.Earlyresults with the new internal fixator systems LCP and LISS:a pro?spective study [J].Acta Orthop Belg,2007,73(1):60-69.
    [19] Tan SL,Balogh ZJ.Indications and limitations of locked plating[J].Injury,2009,40(7):683-691.
    [20] Ellis HB,Ho CA,Podeszwa DA,et al.A comparison of locked ver?sus nonlocked enders rods for length unstable pediatric femoralshaft fractures [J].J Pediatr Orthop,2011,31(8):825-833.
    [21] Kayaokay K,Aktuglu K.Titanium elastic nailing in pediatric femo?ral diaphyseal fractures in the age group of 6-15 years mid-termand long-term outcomes [J].Pal J Med Sci,2018,34(6):1529-1533.
    [22] Memeo A,Panuccio E,D' Amato RD,et al.Retrospective,multi?center evaluation of complications in the treatment of diaphyseal fe?mur fractures in pediatric patients [J].Injury,2019,50(4):60-63.
    [23] Weiss JM,Choi P,Ghatan C,et al.Complications with flexible nail?ing of femur fractures more than double with child obesity andweight>50 kg [J].J Child Orthop,2009,29(1):53-58.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李飞,于铁强,王月光,等. 弹性髓内钉与钢板治疗大龄儿童股骨转子下骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30 (8): 683-688. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.08.03.
LI Fei, YU Tie-qiang, WANG Yue-guang, et al. Elastic stable intramedullary nail versus proximal femoral locking compression plate for femoral subtrochanteric fracture in old children[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2022, 30 (8): 683-688. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.08.03.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:108
  • 下载次数: 316
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-01
  • 最后修改日期:2022-03-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-10