股骨颈系统与空心钉固定青壮年股骨颈骨折△
作者:
作者简介:

冀家琛,在读研究生,研究方向:创伤骨科、骨关节外科,(电话)17691135445,(电子信箱)jjc0504@163.com

中图分类号:

R683.42

基金项目:

陕西省重点研发基金项目(编号:2019SF-192);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(编号:2022JM-546)


Femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的] 比较股骨颈系统 (femoral neck system, FNS) 与空心钉 (cannulated screws, CS) 治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析 2019 年 6 月—2021 年 1 月本院诊治的 137 例青壮年股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料,依据医患沟通结果,64 例采用 FNS 固定 (FNS 组), 73 例采用 CS 固定 (CS 组)。比较两组围手术期、随访和影像资料。[结果] FNS 组手术时间、透视次数、部分负重时间均优于 CS 组 (P<0.05)。FNS 组在术后 3、7、30 d 的 VAS 评分显著优于 CS 组 (P<0.05)。 两组患者术后均获 12 个月以上随访,FNS 组 1 例 (1.56%),CS 组 2 例 (2.7%) 改行 THA。随术后时间推移,两组 Harris 评分、髋屈-伸及内-外旋 ROM 均显著增加(P<0.05)。术后相应时间点,FNS 组的 Harris 评分、髋屈-伸及内-外旋 ROM 均显著优于 CS 组 (P<0.05)。影像方面,FNS 组影像骨折愈合时间显著早于 CS 组 (P<0.05),术后即刻两组间 Garden 对线指数、股骨颈短缩、颈干角的差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05),末次随访时,FNS 组股骨颈短缩发生率、颈干角及内固定切出率均显著优于 CS 组(P<0.05)。[结论]与 CS 相比,FNS 固定牢靠,利于术后髋关节功能的恢复和骨折愈合,临床疗效更优。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of femoral neck system (FNS) versus cannulated screw (CS) for femoral neck fractures in young and middle- aged. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 137 young and middle- aged patients who had been surgically treated for femoral neck fracture at our hospital from June 2019 to January 2021. Based on preoperative doctor-patient com- munication, 64 patients had the fractures fixed with FNS, while the remaining 73 patients were with CS. The perioperative, follow-up and imaging data were compared between the two groups. [Results] All patients in both groups had operation performed smoothly without seri- ous complication. The FNS group proved significantly superior to the CS group in terms of operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, postopera- tive partial weight-bearing time, as well as VAS scores at 3, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P<0.05) . All the patients in both groups were followed up for more than 12 months, and the revision surgery of total hip arthroplasty was performed in 1 case only (1.56%) in the FNS group, whereas 2 cases (2.7%) in the CS group. The Harris score, flexion-extension and internal-external rotation range of motions of the hip (ROMs) increased significantly in both groups over time postoperatively (P<0.05) , which in the FNS group proved significantly superior to those in the CS group at all corresponding time points (P<0.05) . With respect to radiographic evaluation, although there were no signifi- cant differences in term of Garden index, neck shortening and neck-shaft angle between the two groups immediately postoperatively (P> 0.05) , the FNS group proved significantly superior to the CS group in terms of radiographic fracture healing time, as well as femoral neck shortening, neck-shaft angle and internal fixation loosening at the latest follow up (P<0.05) . [Conclusion] The FNS has an advantage of firm fixation of the fracture, which facilitates fracture healing and functional recovery for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged over the CS.

    参考文献
    [1] Bhandari M,Swiontkowski M.Management of acute hip fracture[J].N Engl J Med,2017,377(21):2053-2062.
    [2] Enocson A,Lapidus LJ.The vertical hip fracture-a treatmentchallenge.A cohort study with an up to 9 year follow-up of 137consecutive hips treated with sliding hip screw and antirotationscrew [J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2012,13:171.
    [3] Slobogean GP,Sprague SA,Scott T,et al.Complications followingyoung femoral neck fractures [J].Injury,2015,46(3):484-491.
    [4] Aminian A,Gao F,Fedoriw WW,et al.Vertically oriented femoralneck fractures:mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques [J].J Orthop Trauma,2007,21(8):544-548.
    [5] Xia Y,Zhang W,Zhang Z,et al.Treatment of femoral neck frac?tures:sliding hip screw or cannulated screws?A meta-analysis[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2021,16(1):54.
    [6] Collinge CA,Mir H,Reddix R.Fracture morphology of high shearangle "vertical" femoral neck fractures in young adult patients [J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,28(5):270-275.
    [7] Nyholm AM,Palm H,Sandholdt H,et al.Osteosynthesis with par?allel implants in the treatment of femoral neck fractures:minimaleffect of implant position on risk of reoperation [J].J Bone JointSurg Am,2018,100(19):1682-1690.
    [8] Kunapuli SC,Schramski MJ,Lee AS,et al.Biomechanical analysisof augmented plate fixation for the treatment of vertical shear femo?ral neck fractures [J].J Orthop Trauma,2015,29(3):144-150.
    [9] 仇赛,季晓娟,陆永刚.3 枚与4枚空心钉固定 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折对比 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(6):552-555.
    [10] 庄晓静,高慧秋,王俊,等.经皮加压钢板快速康复与传统方法治疗移位股骨颈骨折的比较 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(6):501-505.
    [11] 胡家朗,李绍刚,陈明,等.新型股骨颈动力加压锁定钉板系统治疗股骨颈骨折 [J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(11):939-944.
    [12] Schopper C,Zderic I,Menze J,et al.Higher stability and more pre?dictive fixation with the Femoral Neck System versus HanssonPins in femoral neck fractures Pauwels II [J].J Orthop Translat,2020,24:88-95.
    [13] Stoffel K,Zderic I,Gras F,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of thefemoral neck system in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck frac?tures:a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulatedscrews [J].J Orthop Trauma,2017,31(3):131-137.
    [14] 王满宜,危杰.股骨颈骨折临床研究的若干问题与新概念 [J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2003,5(1):5-9.
    [15] Zhao D,Qiu X,Wang B,et al.Epiphyseal arterial network and in?ferior retinacular artery seem critical to femoral head perfusion inadults with femoral neck fractures [J].Clin Orthop,2017,475(8):2011-2023.
    [16] Jenkins PJ,Ramaesh R,Pankaj P,et al.A micro-architecturalevaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implantplacement in proximal femoral fractures [J].Acta Orthop,2013,84(5):453-459.
    [17] Nauth A,Creek AT,Zellar A,et al.Fixation using alternative im?plants for the treatment of hip fractures I.Fracture fixation in theoperative management of hip fractures(FAITH):an international,multicentre,randomised controlled trial [J].Lancet,2017,389(10078):1519-1527.
    [18] Medda S,Snoap T,Carroll EA.Treatment of young femoral neckfractures [J].J Orthop Trauma,2019,33(Suppl 1):S1-S6.
    [19] Haider T,Schnabel J,Hochpochler J,et al.Femoral shorteningdoes not impair functional outcome after internal fixation of femo?ral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients [J].Arch Orthop Trau?ma Surg,2018,138(11):1511-1517.
    [20] Yin H,Pan Z,Jiang H.Is dynamic locking plate(Targon FN)a bet?ter choice for treating of intracapsular hip fracture?A meta-analy?sis [J].Int J Surg,2018,52:30-34.
    [21] 陈志清,刘智,田永刚,等.股骨头缺血坏死MRI分期与坏死指数的相关性 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(3):220-223.
    [22] Lamb JN,Holton C,O'Connor P,et al.Avascular necrosis of thehip [J].BMJ,2019,365:l2178.
    [23] Sung YB,Jung EY,Kim KI,et al.Risk factors for neck shorteningin patients with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures treatedwith three parallel screws:is bone density an affecting factor [J].Hip Pelvis,2017,29(4):277-285.
    [24] 王子华,赵德伟.基于显微灌注和三维数字成像的股骨头血供解剖学研究为青壮年股骨颈骨折治疗策略带来的新启示 [J].中华显微外科杂志,2017,40(5):417-418.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

冀家琛,王敏,董亮,等. 股骨颈系统与空心钉固定青壮年股骨颈骨折△[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30 (22): 2022-2027. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.22.02.
JI Jia-chen, WANG Min, DONG Liang, et al. Femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2022, 30 (22): 2022-2027. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.22.02.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:73
  • 下载次数: 175
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-24
  • 最后修改日期:2022-07-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-29