创伤性椎间盘突出脊髓损伤两种颈椎前路融合
作者:
作者简介:

朱海迪,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:脊柱外科,(电话)18913537671,(电子信箱)825089374@qq.com

中图分类号:

R687


Two types of instrumented anterior cervical decompression and fusion for traumatic disc herniation accompanied with spi⁃ nal cord injury
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的]比较零切迹锁定型颈椎融合器(zero-profile, stand-alone cervical cage, ROI-C)与传统颈椎前路椎间融合器联合钛板 (cage and plate, CP) 治疗创伤性椎间盘突出伴脊髓损伤的临床效果。[方法] 回顾性分析 2015 年 9 月—2020 年 9 月收治的 44 例接受颈椎前路手术治疗的创伤性椎间盘突出伴脊髓损伤患者。依据医患沟通结果,21 例采用 ROI-C,23 例采用 CP。比较两组围手术期、随访及影像结果。[结果] 两组患者手术均顺利,无严重术中并发症。ROI-C 组手术时间、切口长度、术中透视次数、术中失血量、下地行走时间及住院时间均显著优于 CP 组 (P<0.05)。两组患者随访时间平均 (16.8±3.2) 个月,ROI-C 组恢复完全负重活动时间显著早于 CP 组(P<0.05)。随时间推移,两组 ASIA 评级、JOA 评分、NDI 评分及锥体术征情况均显著改善(P<0.05)。术前两组患者上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后 1、3 个月,ROI-C 组 ASIA 评级显著优于 CP 组(P<0.05)。影像方面,术后两组患者 C2~7 Cobb 角和椎间隙高度均较术前显著改善(P<0.05),术前两组上述影像指标的差异均无统计学意义 (P>0.05),术后相应时间点 ROI-C 组椎间隙高度显著优于 CP 组 (P<0.05)。术后 3 个月, ROI-C 组椎体间融合情况优于 CP 组(P<0.05)。[结论]对于创伤性椎间盘突出伴脊髓损伤,两种术式均能改善神经功能,改善颈椎生理曲度和维持椎间隙高度。与传统 CP 相比,ROI-C 组具有创伤小、手术时间短等优点,而且恢复患者颈椎椎间隙高度效果明显。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of zero-profile stand-alone cervical cage (ROI-C) versus conventional cage and plate (CP) used in anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for traumatic disc herniation accompanied with spinal cord inju- ry. [Methods] A retrospective study was performed on 44 patients who received ACDF for traumatic disc herniation with spinal cord injury in our department from September 2015 to September 2020. According to doctor-patient communication, 21 patients received ACDF with ROI-C, while the remaining 23 patients had conventional CP used. The perioperative, follow-up and imaging data were compared between the two groups. [Results] All patients in both groups had operation performed successfully without serious intraoperative complications. The ROI-C group proved significantly superior to the CP group in terms of operation time, incision length, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, in- traoperative blood loss, postoperative walking time and hospital stay (P<0.05). All of them were followed up for (16.8±3.2) months on an av- erage, and the ROI-C group resumed full weight-bearing activities significantly earlier than the CP group (P<0.05). The ASIA grade for neurological function, JOA and NDI scores and pyramidal signs improved significantly over time in both groups (P<0.05). Although there were no statistically significant differences in the abovesaid items between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05), the ROI-C group proved significantly superior to the CP group in term of ASIA grade 1 and 3 months after operation (P<0.05). Regarding imaging, postoperative C2~7 Cobb angle and intervertebral height significantly improved in both groups compared with those before surgery (P<0.05), which was not sta- tistically significant between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05), the ROI-C group got significantly higher intervertebral space height than the CP group at all time points postoperatively (P<0.05). In addition, the ROI-C group had significantly better intervertebral fusion than the CP group three months after surgery (P<0.05). [Conclusion] Both procedures do improve neurological function, improve cervical physiological curvature, and maintain intervertebral height for traumatic disc herniation with spinal cord injury. Compared with traditional CP, the ROI-C has the advantages of less trauma and shorter operation time, and more obvious effect of restoring the height of cervical inter- vertebral space.

    参考文献
    [1] Qi C,Xia HH,Miao DC,et al.The influence of timing of surgery inthe outcome of spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality(SCIWORA)[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2020,15(1):223.
    [2] Justin TP,Bryan CW,Franco V,et al.A comparison of retractionpressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc re?placement:a cadaveric study [J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19(5):312-317.
    [3] Hee Hwan T,Majd Mohammad E,Holt Richard T,et al.Complica?tions of multilevel cervical corpectomies and reconstruction with ti?tanium cages and anterior plating [J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(1):1-8.
    [4] Rajesh B,Lee MJ,Yoo JU.Incidence of dysphagia after anteriorcervical spine surgery:a prospective study [J].Spine,2002,27(22):2453-2458.
    [5] Brantigan JW,Steffee AD.A carbon fiber implant to aid interbodylumbar fusion.Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients [J].Spine,1993,18(14);277-282.
    [6] Matgé G,Leclercq TA.Rationale for interbody fusion with thread?ed titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels.Results on 357cases [J].Acta Neurochirurgica,2000,142(4):422-435.
    [7] Joaquim AF,Patel AA,Vaccaro AR.Cervical injuries scored ac?cording to the Subaxial Injury Classification system:An analysis ofthe literature [J].J Cranioverteb Junct Spine,2014,5(2):65-70.
    [8] Rizzolo SJ,Piazza MR,Cotler JM,et al.Intervertebral disc injurycomplicating cervical spine trauma [J].Spine,1991,16(6 Suppl):65-70.
    [9] Szwedowski D,Walecki J.Spinal cord injury without radiographicabnormality(SCIWORA)-clinical and radiological aspects [J].Pol J Radiol,2014,79:461-464.
    [10] Angevine Peter D,Arons Ray R,McCormick Paul C.National andregional rates and variation of cervical discectomy with and with?out anterior fusion,1990-1999 [J].Spine,2003,28(9):931-939.
    [11] Miller Larry E,Block Jon E.Safety and effectiveness of bone al?lografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery [J].Spine,2011,36(24):2045-2050.
    [12] Radcliff KE,Jonathan B,Stewart RJ,et al.Change in angular align?ment is associated with early dysphagia after anterior cervical dis?cectomy and fusion [J].Clin Spine Surg,2016,29(6):1339-1349.
    [13] Daubs MD.Early failures following cervical corpectomy reconstruc?tion with titanium mesh cages and anterior plating [J].Spine,2005,30(12):1402-1406.
    [14] Yang JY,Song HS,Lee M,et al.Adjacent level ossification devel?opment after anterior cervical fusion without plate fixation [J].Spine,2009,34(1):30-33.
    [15] 叶有晨,赵新华,杨永宏.前路颈椎桥形锁定融合器(ROI-C)治疗退变性颈椎间盘疾病的临床应用分析 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(3):209-213.
    [16] Dai L,Jia L.Central cord injury complicating acute cervical discherniation in trauma [J].Spine,2000,25(3):331-335.
    [17] Haruki U,Huang RC,Darren LR.Iatrogenic contributions to cervi?cal adjacent segment pathology:review article [J].HSS J,2015,11(1):26-30.
    [18] O'Neill KR,Wilson RJ,Burns KM,et al.Anterior cervical discec?tomy and fusion for adjacent segment disease:clinical outcomesand cost utility of surgical intervention [J].Clin Spine Surg,2016,29(6):234-241.
    [19] Chang KE,Pham MH,Hsieh PC.Adjacent segment disease requir?ing reoperation in cervical total disc arthroplasty:A literature re?view and update [J].J Clin Neurosci,2016,37:20-24.
    [20] Sasso Rick C,Smucker Joseph D,Hacker Robert J,et al.Artificialdisc versus fusion:a prospective,randomized study with 2-year fol?low-up on 99 patients [J].Spine,2007,32(26):2933-2940.
    [21] Fountas Kostas N,Kapsalaki Eftychia Z,Nikolakakos Leonidas G,et al.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complica?tions [J].Spine,2007,32(21):2310-2317.
    [22] Pitzen TR,Jiri C,Jan S,et al.Implant complications,fusion,lossof lordosis,and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynam?ic or rigid plates:two-year results of a multi-centric,randomized,controlled study [J].Spine,2009,34(7):1689-1694.
    [23] 张磊,章君鑫,刘昊,等.颈前路 ROI-C 与后路单开门治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的对比 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(23):2123-2129.
    [24] Stein MI,Nayak AN,Gaskins RB,et al.Biomechanics of an inte?grated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in asingle-level cervical spine fusion construct [J].Spine J,2014,14(1):128-136.
    [25] 程省,汤立新,李显博,等.颈前路零切迹椎间融合固定双节段颈椎病 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(5):395-398.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

朱海迪,卢赟,邵毅杰,等. 创伤性椎间盘突出脊髓损伤两种颈椎前路融合[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31 (12): 1081-1086. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.12.05.
ZHU Hai-di, LU Yun, SHAO Yi-jie, et al. Two types of instrumented anterior cervical decompression and fusion for traumatic disc herniation accompanied with spi⁃ nal cord injury[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2023, 31 (12): 1081-1086. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.12.05.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:156
  • 下载次数: 724
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-09
  • 最后修改日期:2023-01-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-16