加长PFNA是否捆扎固定股骨转子间转子下骨折(开放获取)
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张立峰,主任医师,研究方向:老年骨折,(电子信箱)zhangdoc4944@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.42

基金项目:

内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才支持计划项目(编号:NJYT23077);内蒙古自治区卫生健康科技计划项目(编号:202202214);内蒙古医科大学联合项目(编号:YKD2021LH019)


Extended proximal femoral nail anti-rotation with or without cerclages for femoral intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures (Open Access)
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]探讨加长股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation, PFNA)联合钢丝捆扎治疗股骨转子间转子下骨折的临床效果。[方法] 回顾性分析 2018 年 2 月—2020 年 6 月本科收治的 26 例股骨转子间的股骨转子下患者的临床资料。根据医患沟通结果,13 例采用单纯加长 PFNA 固定 (未捆扎组),13 例采用加长 PFNA 联合钢丝捆扎固定 (捆扎组)。比较两组围手术期、随访及影像结果。[结果]两组患者均顺利完成手术,未捆扎组的切口长度 [(8.4±1.7) cm vs ( 12.3±2.9) cm, P< 0.001]、术中透视次数 [(49.2±21.5) 次 vs (62.6±15.3) 次, P<0.001] 均显著少于捆扎组,但是,捆扎组恢复部分负重时间显著早于未捆扎组 [(29.0±7.2) d vs (59.7±14.8) 次, P<0.001]。随时间推移,两组患者 VAS 及 Harris 评分、髋伸-屈及髋内-外旋 ROM 显著改善(P<0.05)。捆扎组术后 1 个月 VAS 评分 [(5.6±0.7) vs (7.3±1.0), P<0.001]、Harris 评分 [(64.7±8.3) vs (53.1±9.6) , P<0.001]、髋伸-屈 ROM [(83.2±18.9)° vs (54.7±22.3)° , P<0.001]、髋内-外旋 ROM [(46.4±13.7)° vs (35.8±15.1)° , P=0.017] 及术后 6 个月 Harris 评分 [(82.9±7.6) vs (69.5±10.3), P<0.001] 均显著优于未捆扎组。影像方面,捆扎组 Baumgaertner 骨折复位评级显著优于未捆扎组 [优/良/差, (11/2/0) vs (3/4/6), P=0.002]。与术前相比,术后 1 周及末次随访时,两组颈干角、双侧股骨长度差均显著改善 (P< 0.05),末次随访时,捆扎组颈干角 [(125.8±7.7)° vs (117.4±12.3)° , P=0.047] 、双侧股骨长度差 [(3.0±2.1) mm vs (4.8±3.4) mm, P= 0.049] 均显著优于未捆扎组。两组骨折愈合的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]加长 PFNA 联合钢丝捆扎股骨治疗转子间转子下骨折的早期效果优于单纯使用 PFNA。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the clinical outcomes of extended proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with or without cerclages for femoral intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. [Methods] A retrospective study was done on 26 patients who received open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for femoral intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in our department from February 2018 to June 2020. According to the surgeon-patient discussion preoperatively, 13 patients had the fractures fixed by extended PFNA alone (non-cerclage group), while other 13 patients were fixed by extended PFNA combined with steel wire cerclages (cerclage group). The documents of perioperative period, follow-up and images were compared between the two groups. [Results] All patients in both groups had corresponding surgical procedures performed successfully. Although the non-cerclage group consumed significantly less total incision length [(8.4±1.7) cm vs (12.3±2.9) cm, P<0.001], intraoperative fluoroscopy times [(49.2±21.5) times vs (62.6±15.3) times, P<0.001] than the cerclage group, the cerclage group resumed partial weight bearing activity significantly earlier than the non-cerclage group [(29.0±7.2) days vs (59.7±14.8) days, P<0.001]. The VAS and Harris scores, as well as hip extension-flexion range of motion (ROM) and internal-external rotation ROM significantly improved over time in both groups (P<0.05). The cerclage group proved significantly superior to the non-cerclage group in terms of VAS score [(5.6±0.7) vs (7.3 ±1.0), P<0.001], Harris score [(64.7±8.3) vs (53.1±9.6), P<0.001], hip flexion-extension ROM [(83.2±18.9)° vs (54.7±22.3)°, P<0.001], and internal-external rotation ROM [(46.4±13.7)° vs (35.8±15.1)°, P=0.017] 1 month postoperatively, as well as Harris score [(82.9±7.6) vs (69.5±10.3), P<0.001] 6 months postoperatively. Regarding imaging, the cerclage group proved significantly superior to the non-cerclage group in fracture reduction quality based on Baumgaertner's criteria [excellent/good/ poor, (11/2/0) vs (3/4/6), P=0.002]. Compared with those preoperatively, the femoral shaft-neck angle (FSNA) and bilateral femur length discrepancy (BFLD) was significantly improved in both groups 1 week after operation and at the last follow-up (P<0.05). The cerclage group proved significantly better than the non-cerclage group in terms of FSNA [(125.8±7.7)° vs (117.4±12.3)°, P=0.047] and BFLD [(3.0±2.1) mm vs (4.8±3.4) mm, P=0.049] at the latest follow-up, regardless of insignificant difference in fracture healing between the two groups (P> 0.05). [Conclusion] The extended PFNA combined with wire cerclages is considerably better in clinical consequences over the extended PFNA alone for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张立峰,红荣,贾燕飞,等. 加长PFNA是否捆扎固定股骨转子间转子下骨折(开放获取)[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32 (10): 865-871. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2024.10.01.
ZHANG Li-feng, HONG Rong, JIA Yan-fei, et al. Extended proximal femoral nail anti-rotation with or without cerclages for femoral intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures (Open Access)[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2024, 32 (10): 865-871. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2024.10.01.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-26
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-05-20
  • 出版日期: