双束袢钢板与锁骨钩治疗急性肩锁脱位比较
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学附属明基医院骨科,江苏南京 210019

作者简介:

沈国蔚,副主任医师,硕士研究生,研究方向:创伤骨科,(电子信箱)leoshen_84@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.41

基金项目:

南京市卫生科技发展专项基金项目(编号:YKK21252)


Comparison of double-loop buttons and clavicular hook for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Orthopedics, BenQMedical Center, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210019 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较双束Endobutton 带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析2019 年1月—2021 年6 月本院收治的44 例Rockwood III 型以上的急性肩锁关节脱位患者的临床资料,21 例采用双束Endobutton 带袢钢板固定(袢板组),23 例采用钩钢板固定(钩板组),比较两组围手术期、随访及影像学资料。[结果] 两组手术时间、术中失血量及主动活动时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但袢板组切口长度[(5.3±0.6) cm vs (6.2±1.1) cm, P=0.002]、住院时间[(8.1±1.6) d vs (9.6±2.8) d, P=0.042] 显著优于钩板组。随访时间平均(14.5±3.3) 个月,随时间推移,两组VAS 评分、Constant-Murley 评分、肩关节前屈上举及外展上举ROM 均显著改善(P<0.05)。术前两组间上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3 个月及末次随访时,袢板组VAS 评分[(2.1±0.7) vs (3.4±0.7), P<0.001; (1.0±0.7) vs (2.4±0.8), P<0.001]、Constant-Murley 评分[(80.8±3.3) vs (69.4±5.0), P<0.001; (90.0±3.1) vs (80.4±5.8), P<0.001]、肩关节前屈上举ROM [(147.6±7.0)° vs (117.4±8.1)°, P<0.001; (171.9±6.8)° vs (153.0±9.1)°, P<0.001] 及外展上举ROM [(140.0±7.7)° vs (99.1±6.7)°, P<0.001; (165.7±5.1)° vs (140.4±8.2)°, P<0.001] 均显著优于钩板组。影像学方面,两组患者术后喙锁间距、肩锁间距均显著减小(P<0.05);相应时间点,两组间上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] 双束Endobutton 带袢钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位,较锁骨钩钢板固定,具有手术切口更小、肩关节功能更好、并发症发生率更少等优势,且无需二次取出内置物,是治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的良好选择。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of double-loop Endobutton plates and clavicular hook plate for acute acromio-clavicular dislocation. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 44 patients who received surgical treatment for Rockwood typeIII or more severe type acute acromioclavicular dislocation in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2021. Based on surgeon-patient dis-cussion, 21 patients received double-loop button plates fixation (the DLB group), while other 23 patients underwent hook plate fixation (theHP group). Perioperative period, follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared. [Results] Although there were no significantdifferences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss and active activity time between the two groups (P>0.05), the DLB group proved sig-nificantly superior to the HP group in terms of incision length [(5.3±0.6) cm vs (6.2±1.1) cm, P=0.002] and hospital stay [(8.1±1.6) days vs(9.6±2.8) days, P=0.042]. As time went on in the follow-up period lasted for (14.5±3.3) months on an average, the VAS and Constant-Mur-ley scores, as well as shoulder forward flexion-uplifting and abduction-uplifting range of motions (ROMs) significantly improved in bothgroups (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the abovesaid items before operation (P>0.05), but the DLB group was significantlybetter than the HP group 3 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up in terms of VAS score [(2.1±0.7) vs (3.4±0.7), P<0.001; (1.0±0.7) vs (2.4±0.8), P<0.001], Constant-Murley score [(80.8±3.3) vs (69.4±5.0), P<0.001; (90.0±3.1) vs (80.4±5.8.), P<0.001], forward flex-ion-uplifting ROM [(147.6±7.0)° vs (117.4±8.1)°, P<0.001; (171.9±6.8)° vs (153.0±9.1)°, P<0.001] and abduction-uplifting ROM [(140.0±7.7)° vs (99.1±6.7)°, P<0.001; (165.7±5.1)° vs (140.4±8.2)°, P<0.001]. With respect of imaging, the postoperative coracoclavicular distanceand acromioclavicular distance were significantly decreased in both groups compared with those preoperatively (P<0.05), whereas whichwere not statistically significant between the two groups at any time points accordingly (P>0.05). [Conclusion] The double-loop button plates have advantages of smaller surgical incision, better shoulder function recovery, less complication rate, and no need to remove the im-plant secondarily over the hook plat , therefore, the double-loop button plates maybe a better choice for the treatment of acute acromiocla-vicular dislocation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

沈国蔚,李冬冬,彭俊洋,等. 双束袢钢板与锁骨钩治疗急性肩锁脱位比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32 (16): 1474-1479. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100669.
SHEN Guo-wei, LI Dongdong, PENG Jun-yang, et al. Comparison of double-loop buttons and clavicular hook for acute acromioclavicular dislocation[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2024, 32 (16): 1474-1479. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100669.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-20
  • 最后修改日期:2024-03-04
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-08-19
  • 出版日期: