首页 > 过刊浏览>2024年第32卷第18期 >1657-1662. DOI:10.20184/j.cnki.Issn1005-8478.11015A
HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
前路股骨头置换是否修复关节囊的比较
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东大学，山东济南 250000 ; 2.山东省立医院创伤骨科，山东济南 250000 ;3.山东省德州市陵城区人民医院急诊科，山东德州 253500 ;4.山东省邹平市人民医院骨二科，山东邹平 256200

作者简介:

王祥华，硕士，研究方向：创伤骨科，（电子信箱）wxhgx2@163.com

中图分类号:

R687


Anterior approach femoral head replacement for femoral neck fracture with or without capsule repair
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Shandong University, Jinan 250000 , China ; 2.Department ofTraumatic Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250021 , Shandong, China ; 3.Department of Emergency, People's Hospital ofLingcheng District Dezhou City, Dezhou 253500 , Shandong China ; 4.The Second Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of ZoupingCity, Zouping 256200 , Shandong China

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [27]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较股骨颈骨折经前路股骨头置换术是否缝合关节囊的临床结果。[方法] 回顾性分析2015 年2 月—2020年6 月本院前路股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折82 例患者的临床资料。依据术前医患沟通结果，35 例术中缝合关节囊， 47例未缝合关节囊。比较两组围手术期、随访和影像资料。[结果] 虽然缝合组手术时间显著长于未缝合组[(72.3±10.4) min vs(53.6±8.9) min, P＜0.001]，但缝合组术中失血量[(172.6±24.6) ml vs (226.3±32.5) ml, P＜0.001]、下地行走时间[(4.2±1.0) d vs (5.6±1.7) d, P＜0.001]、住院时间[(10.3±2.3) d vs (12.5±2.4) d, P＜0.001] 均显著优于未缝合组。随访12 个月以上，缝合组恢复完全负重活动显著早于未缝合组[(48.3±8.0) d vs (70.4±13.3) d, P＜0.001]。与术后6 个月相比，两组患者末次随访时疼痛VAS 评分均降低，而SF-36 评分、Harris 评分、髋伸屈ROM 均增加（P＜0.05）。末次随访时，缝合组的VAS 评分、SF-36 评分均显著优于未缝合组（P＜0.05）。影像方面，末次随访时，缝合组双侧股骨长度差显著小于未缝合组（P＜0.05）。[结论] 在股骨颈骨折经前路股骨头置换术中，缝合关节囊的做法在术中失血量、术后康复、疼痛减轻、生活质量以及髋关节功能恢复等多方面明显优于不缝合关节囊。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior approach femoral head replacement for femoral neck fracture withor without capsule suture. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 82 elderly patients who received anterior approach femoralhead replacement for femoral neck fractures in our hospital from February 2015 to June 2020. According to preoperative doctor-patientcommunication, 35 patients had capsule sutured, while other 47 patients were unsutured. The documents regarding to perioperative period,follow-up and images were compared between the two groups. [Results] Although the sutured group consumed significantly longer opera-tive time than the unsutured group [(72.3±10.4) min vs (53.6±8.9) min, P＜0.001], the former proved significantly superior to the latter interms of intraoperative blood loss [(172.6±24.6) ml vs (226.3±32.5) ml, P＜0.001], postoperative ambulation time [(4.2±1.0) days vs (5.6±1.7)days, P＜0.001] and hospital stay [(10.3±2.3) days vs (12.5±2.4) days, P＜0.001]. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months, andthe sutured group resume full weight-bearing activity significantly earlier than the unsutured group [(48.3±8.0) days vs (70.4±13.3) days, P＜0.001]. Compared with those 6 months after surgery, the pain VAS score significantly decreased (P＜0.05), while SF-36, Harris scores andhip extension -flexion ROM significantly increased in both groups at the latest follow-up (P＜0.05). At all corresponding time points, VASscore and SF-36 score in sutured group were significantly better than those in unsutured group (P＜0.05). As for imaging, the sutured groupgot significantly less bilateral femur length discrepancy than the unsutured group at the last follow-up (P＜0.05). [Conclusion] Suturing thejoint capsule is significantly better than the non-suturing regarding many factors such as intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery,pain relief, quality of life improvement and hip function recovery in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

    参考文献
    [1] Lo IN,Tzeng YH,Wang CS,et al.Initial femoral stem position incementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients is associated with early implant subsidence:A radiographic analysis [J].Injury,2021,52(7):1801-1806.DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.006.
    [2] 叶赟,赵滨,陈德斌,等.后上方微创入路与后外侧入路在股骨粗隆间骨折股骨头置换术中的对比分析[J].贵州医药,2019,43(9):1427-1428.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.09.034.Ye Y,Zhao B,Chen DB,et al.Comparative analysis of posterior superior minimally invasive approach and posterolateral approach infemoral head replacement for intertrochanteric fractures [J].Guizhou Medical Journal,2019,43(9):1427-1428.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.09.034.
    [3] 李刚,王跃.直接前路人工股骨头置换治疗移位性股骨颈骨折的短期随访[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(7):1014-1019.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0111.Li G,Wang Y.Short-term outcomes of displaced femoral neckfractures treated with hemiarthropIasty using direct anterior approach [J].Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue EngineeringResearch,2018,22(7):1014-1019.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0111.
    [4] 吴泽文,张延伟,谢家辉,等.脱位头颈开窗植骨术治疗围塌陷期股骨头坏死的疗效及随访影像学结果分析[J].河北医学,2020,26(3):498-502.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2020.03.035.Wu ZW,Zhang YW,Xie JH,et al.Effect of osteonecrosis of thefemoral head in the period of collapse with dislocation of head andneck and analysis of follow-up imaging results [J].Hebei MedicalJournal,2020,26(3):498-502.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2020.03.035.
    [5] 中华医学会.临床诊疗指南.骨科分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.Chinese Medical Association.Clinical diagnosis and treatmentguidelines.Orthopedics Division [M].Beijing:People's MedicalPulishing House,2009.
    [6] Harris WH.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures:treatment by mold arthroplasty.An end-resultstudy using a new method of result evaluation [J].J Bone JointSurg Am,1969,51(4):737-755.
    [7] Combalia M,Mu?oz-Mahamud E,Febles-Oviedo JL,et al.Spontaneous non-traumatic dislocation of the hip as a complication ofscrew-plate fixation of a femoral neck fracture [J].Injury,2021,24:S0020.DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.063.
    [8] Wei P,Xu Y,Gu Y,et al.Conservative vs surgical treatment of impacted femoral neck fracture in patients 75 years and older [J].JAm Geriatr Soc,2020,68(10):2214-2221.DOI:10.1111/jgs.16535.Epub 2020 May 15
    [9] 边荣.健康教育及心理护理干预对高龄股骨颈骨折人工关节置换术患者预后的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(8):1391-1392.DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2019.08.091.Bian R.Study on the impact of health education and psychologicalnursing intervention on the prognosis of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture arthroplasty [J].Chinese Remedies & Clinics,2019,19(8):1391-1392.DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2019.08.091.
    [10] Liang J,Zhao Y,Gao X,et al.Design of custom-made navigationaltemplate of femoral head and pilot research in total hip resurfacingarthroplasty [J].BMC Surg,2020,20(1):144.DOI:10.1186/s12893-020-00807-7.
    [11] 顾三军,王建兵,徐可林,等.SuperPATH 入路髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效评价[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2018,11(10):742-745.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2018.10.005.Gu SJ,Wang JB,Xu KL,et al.Short-term effect of hip arthroplastythrough the SuperPATH approach for femoral neck fractures [J].Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,2018,11(10):742-745.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2018.10.005.
    [12] Castelli E,Schmierer PA,Pozzi A.Custom acetabular prosthesisfor total hip replacement:A case report in a dog with acetabularbone loss after femoral head and neck ostectomy [J].Vet Surg,2019,48(8):1520-1529.DOI:10.1111/vsu.13303.
    [13] 庾明,王进,吴治林.人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术对股骨颈骨折患者术中情况及术后疗效对比研究[J].河北医学,2021,27(3):443-447.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2021.03.019.Yu M,Wang J,Wu ZL.Effects of total knee replacement and artificial femoral head replacement on femoral neck fracture and deepvenous thrombosis in lower limbs [J].Hebei Medical Journal,2021,27(3):443-447.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2021.03.019.
    [14] 徐立军,段军,陈又年,等.改良Hardinge入路双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(8):829-830.DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2018.08.013.Xu LJ,Duan J,Chen YN,et al.Effect of bipolar femoral neck fracture in modified Hardinge approach [J].Chinese Journal of Boneand Joint Injury,2018,33(8):829-830.DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2018.08.013.
    [15] 范磊,李杰,赵大中.双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效对比分析[J].河北医学,2018,24(5):830-834.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.05.034.Fan L,Li J,Zhao DZ.Comparison of bipolar artificial femoral headreplacement and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of senilefemoral neck fracture [J].Hebei Medical Journal,2018,24(5):830-834.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.05.034.
    [16] Valente G,Lanting B,MacDonald S,et al.Femoral head materialloss at the head-neck junction in total hip arthroplasty:the effectof head size,stem material and stem offset [J].Hip Int,2019,29(6):647-651.DOI:10.1177/1120700018814473.
    [17] 梁锋,沈思远,田纪伟,等.骨质疏松股骨颈骨折两种入路全髋置换比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(10):929-932.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2023.10.14.Liang F,Shen SY,Tian JW,et al.Comparison of two approachesfor total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic femoralneck fractures [J].Orthopedic Journal of China,2023,31(10):929-932.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2023.10.14.
    [18] 肖守允,沈思远,梁锋,等.直接前入路全髋关节置换的学习曲线[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2024,32(1):80-83.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2024.01.14.Xiao SY,Shen SY,Liang F,et al.Learning curve of total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach [J].Orthopedic Journal ofChina,2024,32(1):80-83.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2024.01.14.
    [19] 卞胡伟,蒋涛,薛峰.直接前侧入路髋关节置换的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(13):1194-1197.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2023.13.08.Bian HW,Jiang T,Xue F.Research progress on direct anterior approach for hip arthroplasty [J].Orthopedic Journal of China,2023,31(13):1194-1197.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2023.13.08.
    [19] Kim DK,Kim TH.Femoral neck shaft angle in relation to the location of femoral stress fracture in young military recruits:femoralhead versus femoral neck stress fracture [J].Skelet Radiol,2021,50(6):1163-1168.DOI:10.1007/s00256-020-03661-z.
    [20] 刘永强,郝志鹏,彭毅,等.保留后关节囊在髋关节置换手术中的应用价值[J].河北医药,2021,43(9):1354-1356,1360.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2021.09.016.Liu YQ椬慈潡??博??畐?呮卧?教琬?慴氠??愮牁汰祰?敩晣晡楴捩慯据礠?潡晬?灥攠牯捦甠瑰慯湳整潥畲獩?慲猠獪楯獩瑮整摣?橰潳極湬瑥?捰慲灥獳略汲敶?慴灩灯牮漠慩据栠?晩潰爠?晥数浬潡牣慥汭?湮整挠歛?晝爮慈捥瑢略物攠?楥湤?散污摬攠牊汯祵灲慮瑡楬攬渲琰猲?嬬?崳??栩椺渱攳猵攴??漳电父測愱氳?漰昮??潉椺渱琰?匳甹父朹支牪礮??汳敮挮琱爰漰渲椭挷″?搶椮琲椰漲渱??代??????????????㈠????俯??????????挭洯愦?樍?概珊珹港?????????塛??????は???????戳爨?):784-786.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.05.044.Cai J,Fang K,Su L.The effect of joint capsule repair on postoperative joint stability during hip arthroplasty [J].Guizhou MedicalJournal,2019,43(5):784-786.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.05.044.
    [22] O'Connor JD,Hill JC,Beverland DE,et al.Influence of preoperative femoral orientation on radiographic measures of femoral headheight in total hip replacement [J].Clin Biomech,2021,81(5):105247.DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105247.
    [23] 黄润华,尚希福,廖中亚,等.直接前方入路初次全髋关节置换术关节囊切除与保留的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2020,23(5):650-655.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2020.05.015.Huang RH,Shang XF,Liao ZY,et al.Clinical effect comparison ofresecting or reserving joint capsule in the primary total hip arthroplastyvia direct anterior approach [J].Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics,2020,23(5):650-655.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2020.05.015.
    [24] Wang XB,Panf QJ,Yu X.Finite element analysis of different diameter prosthesis ball head in artificial femoral head replacement[J].Zhongguo Gu Shang,2020,33(6):558-563.DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.06.014.
    [25] 汪康,李胜华,邓英虎,等.改良SuperPATH入路双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折早期疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(12):1276-1278.DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2018.12.015.Wang K,Li SH,Deng YH,et al.Early efficacy analysis of bipolarfemoral neck fracture in the elderly [J].Chinese Journal of Boneand Joint Injury,2018,33(12):1276-1278.DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2018.12.015.
    [26] Hua KC,Yang XG,Feng JT,et al.The efficacy and safety of coredecompression for the treatment of femoral head necrosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):306.DOI:10.1186/s13018-019-1359-7.
    [27] 朱成栋,乔高山,胡天胜,等.经皮辅助关节囊入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2019,13(3):278-283.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.03.004.Zhu CD,Q
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王祥华,胡宗亮,谷新,等. 前路股骨头置换是否修复关节囊的比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32 (18): 1657-1662. DOI：10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.11015A.
WANG Xianghua, HU Zong-liang, GU Xin, et al. Anterior approach femoral head replacement for femoral neck fracture with or without capsule repair[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2024, 32 (18): 1657-1662. DOI：10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.11015A.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-10
  • 最后修改日期:2024-06-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-20
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器，其他浏览器不建议使用!
通讯地址：山东省泰安市泰山区环山路217-1号泰安八十八医院 中国矫形外科杂志编辑部 邮政编码：271000 电话：0538-6213228
网址：https://jxwk.ijournals.cn/ E-mail：jiaoxingtougao@163.com
中国矫形外科杂志 ® 2025 版权所有