3D打印辅助桥接组合固定THA股骨假体周围骨折(开放获取)
作者:
作者单位:

武汉市第四医院骨科,湖北武汉 430000

作者简介:

左伟,副主任医师,博士,研究方向:关节外科,(电话)027-83353521,(电子信箱)weizuotj@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.42

基金项目:

湖北省卫生健康委科研资助项目(编号:WJ2023M133)


3D printing assisted bridge combination fixation for periprosthetic fractures of proximal femur
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Hospital of Wuhan City, Wuhan,Hubei 430000 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 评价 3D 打印辅助桥接组合固定 Vancouver B1 和 C 型股骨假体周围骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析 2016 年 3 月—2022 年 5 月 3D 打印辅助桥接组合固定 Vancouver B1 型和 C 型 27 例股骨假体周围骨折患者的临床资料,评价临床及影像结果。[结果] 27 例患者中,Vancouver B1 型骨折 15 例, Vancouver C 型 12 例。两组手术时间 [(107.3±18.7) min vs (119.2±19.3) min, P=0.713] 和术中出血量 [(385.3±114.1) mL vs (420.8±160.2) mL, P=0.381] 的差异均无统计学意义。随访期间无伤口感染、内固定松动、骨折不愈合或畸形愈合等并发症发生。两组患者骨折愈合时间 [(3.8±1.3) 个月 vs (4.2±1.6) 个月, P= 0.258]、伤前 Harris 评分 [(86.3±3.5) vs (86.9±3.3), P=0.903] 和翻修内固定后 12 个月 Harris 评分 [(84.3±3.4) vs (85.2±3.1), P=0.785] 的差异均无统计学意义。[结论]3D 打印辅助桥接组合固定 THA 术后 Vancouver B1 和 C 型股骨假体周围骨折,近、中期临床效果良好,两个骨折类型的治疗效果无显著差异。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3D printing-assisted bridging combination fixation of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic fractures of the femur. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 27 patients who had Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic fractures fixed by 3D printing assisted bridging combination fixation from March 2016 to May 2022. The clinical and imaging documents were evaluated. [Results] Of the 27 patients, there were 15 cases of Vancouver type B1 fractures and 12 cases of Vancouver type C fractures. There were no significant differences in operation time [(107.3±18.7) min vs (119.2±19.3) min, P=0.713] and intraoperative bleeding [(385.3±114.1) mL vs (420.8±160.2) mL, P=0.381] between the two groups. No complications such as wound infection, loose internal fixation, fracture nonunion or malunion occurred in anyone of them during follow-up. There were no significant differences in fracture healing time [(3.8±1.3) months vs (4.2±1.6) months, P=0.258], Harris score before injury [(86.3±3.5) vs (86.9±3.3), P= 0.903] and Harris score 12 months after revision [(84.3±3.4) vs (85.2±3.1), P=0.785] between the two types of the fractures. [Conclusion] 3D printing-assisted bridging combination fixation of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic fractures of the femur after THA achieves satisfactory short-medium term clinical consequence, and there is no significant difference in the treatment outcome between the two fracture types.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

左伟,肖飞,黄玉成,等. 3D打印辅助桥接组合固定THA股骨假体周围骨折(开放获取)[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2025, 33 (9): 834-837. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100791.
ZUO Wei, XIAO Fei, HUANG Yu-cheng, et al. 3D printing assisted bridge combination fixation for periprosthetic fractures of proximal femur[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2025, 33 (9): 834-837. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100791.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-06
  • 出版日期:
关闭