3D打印辅助桥接组合固定THA股骨假体周围骨折(开放获取)
作者:
作者单位:

武汉市第四医院骨科,湖北武汉 430000

作者简介:

左伟,副主任医师,博士,研究方向:关节外科,(电话)027-83353521,(电子信箱)weizuotj@163.com

中图分类号:

R683.42

基金项目:

湖北省卫生健康委科研资助项目(编号:WJ2023M133)


3D printing assisted bridge combination fixation for periprosthetic fractures of proximal femur
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Hospital of Wuhan City, Wuhan,Hubei 430000 , China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 评价 3D 打印辅助桥接组合固定 Vancouver B1 和 C 型股骨假体周围骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析 2016 年 3 月—2022 年 5 月 3D 打印辅助桥接组合固定 Vancouver B1 型和 C 型 27 例股骨假体周围骨折患者的临床资料,评价临床及影像结果。[结果] 27 例患者中,Vancouver B1 型骨折 15 例, Vancouver C 型 12 例。两组手术时间 [(107.3±18.7) min vs (119.2±19.3) min, P=0.713] 和术中出血量 [(385.3±114.1) mL vs (420.8±160.2) mL, P=0.381] 的差异均无统计学意义。随访期间无伤口感染、内固定松动、骨折不愈合或畸形愈合等并发症发生。两组患者骨折愈合时间 [(3.8±1.3) 个月 vs (4.2±1.6) 个月, P= 0.258]、伤前 Harris 评分 [(86.3±3.5) vs (86.9±3.3), P=0.903] 和翻修内固定后 12 个月 Harris 评分 [(84.3±3.4) vs (85.2±3.1), P=0.785] 的差异均无统计学意义。[结论]3D 打印辅助桥接组合固定 THA 术后 Vancouver B1 和 C 型股骨假体周围骨折,近、中期临床效果良好,两个骨折类型的治疗效果无显著差异。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3D printing-assisted bridging combination fixation of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic fractures of the femur. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 27 patients who had Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic fractures fixed by 3D printing assisted bridging combination fixation from March 2016 to May 2022. The clinical and imaging documents were evaluated. [Results] Of the 27 patients, there were 15 cases of Vancouver type B1 fractures and 12 cases of Vancouver type C fractures. There were no significant differences in operation time [(107.3±18.7) min vs (119.2±19.3) min, P=0.713] and intraoperative bleeding [(385.3±114.1) mL vs (420.8±160.2) mL, P=0.381] between the two groups. No complications such as wound infection, loose internal fixation, fracture nonunion or malunion occurred in anyone of them during follow-up. There were no significant differences in fracture healing time [(3.8±1.3) months vs (4.2±1.6) months, P=0.258], Harris score before injury [(86.3±3.5) vs (86.9±3.3), P= 0.903] and Harris score 12 months after revision [(84.3±3.4) vs (85.2±3.1), P=0.785] between the two types of the fractures. [Conclusion] 3D printing-assisted bridging combination fixation of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic fractures of the femur after THA achieves satisfactory short-medium term clinical consequence, and there is no significant difference in the treatment outcome between the two fracture types.

    参考文献
    [1] Patsiogiannis N,Kanakaris NK,Giannoudis PV.Periprosthetic hip fractures:an update into their management and clinical outcomes [J].EFORT Open Rev,2021,6(1):75-92.DOI:10.1302/2058-5241.6.200050.
    [2] Brady OH,Garbuz DS,Masri BA,et al.The reliability of validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement [J].J Arthroplasty,2000,15(1):59-62.DOI:10.1016/S0883-5403(00)91181-1.
    [3] Abdel MP,Houdek MT,Watts CD,et al.Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties:a 40-year experience [J].Bone Joint J,2016,98-B(4):468-474.DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37203.
    [4] Bryant GK,Morshed S,Agel J,et al.Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures [J].Injury,2009,40(11):1180-1186.DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2009.02.017.
    [5] Xue H,Tu Y,Cai M,et al.Locking compression plate and cerclage band for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures preliminary results at average 30-month follow-up [J].J Arthroplasty,2011,26(3):467-471.DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.031.
    [6] Chatziagorou G,Lindahl H,K?rrholm J.Lower reoperation rate with locking plates compared with conventional plates in Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures:a register study of 639 cases in Sweden [J].Injury,2019,50(12):2292-2300.DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.029.
    [7] 郑殿宾,李典,沈鹏,等.Vanconver B1 型股骨假体周围骨折的个性化治疗 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(24):2209-2212.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2020.24.01.Zheng DB,Li D,Shen P,et al.Individualized surgical treatment for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture [J].Orthopedic Journal of China,2020,28(24):2209-2212.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2020.24.01.
    [8] K?sters C,Toom D,Metzlaff S,et al.Peri-and interprosthetic femoral fractures-current concepts and new developments for internal fixation [J].J Clin Med,2022,11(5):1371.DOI:10.3390/jcm110 51371.
    [9] Kim YH,Mansukhani SA,Kim JS,et al.Use of locking plate and strut onlay allografts for periprosthetic fracture around well-fixed femoral components [J].J Arthroplasty,2017,32(1):166-170.DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.064.
    [10] Fleischman AN,Chen AF.Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem:overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls [J].Ann Transl Med,2015,3(16):234.DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.20 15.09.32.
    [11] 任义军,严立,胡锐,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗合并感染的股骨骨折 [J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(11):956-960.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2016.11.007.Ren YJ,Yan L,Hu R,et al.Bridging compound internal fixation system for treatment of femoral fractures with postoperative infection [J].Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2016,18(11):956-960.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2016.11.007.
    [12] 王文,左贵来,王凡,等.3D 打印手术导板结合桥接内固定系统异型块治疗股骨复杂骨折 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(22):2086-2090.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.22.15.Wang W,Zuo GL,Wang F,et al.3D printed guide and specialshaped bridge combined fixation system for treatment of complex femoral fracture [J].Orthopedic Journal of China,2017,25(22):2086-2090.DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.22.15.
    [13] 王文,龙运涛,左贵来,等.桥接组合式内固定系统与钢板固定股骨假体周围 Vancouver B1 型骨折的生物力学研究 [J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(1):47-53.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210506-00340.Wang W,Long YT,Zuo GL,et al.Biomechanical comparison of Ortho-Bridge system and plate fixation system for femoral periprosthetic type Vancouver B1 fracture [J].Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics,2022,42(1):47-53.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210506-00340.
    [14] 王明政,郑兆君,张伟,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗 Vancouver B1 型股骨假体周围骨折 [J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(9):804-807.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20200331-0022 1.Wang MZ,Zheng ZJ,Zhang W,et al.Bridge internal fixation system for periprosthetic femoral fracture of Vancouver type B1 [J].Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma,2020,22(9):804-807.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20200331-00221.
    [15] 王英彪,曾展鹏,郑伟杰.桥接组合式内固定系统在人工髋关节股骨假体周围骨折中的应用 [J].海南医学,2021,32(15):2001-2003.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2021.15.026.Wang YB,Zeng ZP,Zheng WJ.Application of bridge combined internal fixation system in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture [J].Hainan Medical Journal,2021,32(15):2001-2003.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2021.15.026.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

左伟,肖飞,黄玉成,等. 3D打印辅助桥接组合固定THA股骨假体周围骨折(开放获取)[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2025, 33 (9): 834-837. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100791.
ZUO Wei, XIAO Fei, HUANG Yu-cheng, et al. 3D printing assisted bridge combination fixation for periprosthetic fractures of proximal femur[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2025, 33 (9): 834-837. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100791.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:62
  • 下载次数: 44
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-06