微创与开放TLIF治疗腰椎间盘突出伴功能性侧弯
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

陈龙,硕士研究生,研究方向:脊柱退变临床与基础研究,(电话)15980227238,(电子信箱)chenlongcl56@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R681.53

基金项目:

福建省科技厅科技创新联合资金项目(编号:2017Y9063)


Minimally invasive TLIF versus open counterpart for single- segment lumbar disc herniation with functional scoliosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的] 评估内镜辅助经椎间孔腰椎融合术 (minimaly invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, MISTLIF)治疗伴功能性脊柱侧弯的单节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析 2014 年 6 月—2020 年 12 月接受手术的 51 例伴有功能性脊柱侧弯的单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,依据医患沟通结果,20 例采用 MIS-TLIF (微创组),31 例采用开放 TLIF (开放组)。比较两组临床和影像资料。[结果] 两组患者均顺利完成手术,术中无神经、血管损伤等严重并发症。微创组术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间显著优于开放组(P<0.05)。随访(19.55±4.28)个月,随时间推移,两组腰腿痛 VAS、ODI 评分均显著降低 (P<0.05),但相应时间点,两组间上述评分的差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。影像方面,两组末次随访时侧弯 Cobb 角较术前均显著显著减小 (P<0.05),而椎间隙高度及与 L1~S1前凸角显著增加 (P<0.05)。[结论] 与开放 TLIF 相比,内镜辅助 TLIF 具有手术切口小、术中出血量少、术后住院时间短的优势。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-level lumbar disc herniation with functional scoliosis. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 51 patients who underwent surgical treatment for single-level lumbar disc herniation with functional scoliosis from June 2014 to December 2020. According to doctorpatient communication, 20 patients received MIS- TLIF (the MIS group) , while the other 31 patients underwent open TLIF (the open group) . The clinical and imaging data of the two groups were compared. [Results] All patients in both groups had operation completed suc- cessfully without serious complications. The MIS group proved significantly superior to the open group in terms of intraoperative bleeding, incision length and hospital stay (P<0.05) . As time went during the follow-up lasted for (19.55±4.28) months, the VAS scores for lumbar and leg pain, as well as ODI score in both groups significantly decreased (P<0.05) , whereas which were not statistically significant between the two groups at any corresponding time points (P>0.05) . Radiographically, the scoliotic Cobb angle significantly decreased (P<0.05) , while the height of intervertebral space and L1~S1 lordotic angle significantly increased in both groups at the latest follow-up compared with those preoperatively (P<0.05) . [Conclusion] This endoscope-assisted TLIF has advantages of smaller surgical incision, less intraoperative bleeding, and shorter hospital stay over the open TLIF for single-level lumbar disc herniation with functional scoliosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈龙,刘伟东,张维顺,等. 微创与开放TLIF治疗腰椎间盘突出伴功能性侧弯[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30 (18): 1708-1711. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.18.17.
CHEN Long, LIU Wei-dong, ZHANG Wei-shun, et al. Minimally invasive TLIF versus open counterpart for single- segment lumbar disc herniation with functional scoliosis[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2022, 30 (18): 1708-1711. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2022.18.17.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:September 01,2021
  • 最后修改日期:June 23,2022
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: June 29,2023
  • 出版日期: