多节段经椎间孔椎体间融合三种引流方式比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张姗姗,主管护师,研究方向:脊柱外科护理学,(电话)13661601512,(电子信箱)934575858@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687

基金项目:

海军军医大学第一附属医院“234”攀峰计划临床学科创新项目(编号:2020YXK040)


Comparison of three drainage methods after multi-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较多节段经椎间孔椎体间融合 (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF) 3 种引流方式临床疗效。[方法]2019 年 7 月—2021 年 6 月在本科行 TLIF 治疗的多节段腰椎退变 104 例患者采用随机数字表法分为三组,于 TLIF 术后分别给予 3 种引流,其中,34 例行间断负压引流,37 例行持续负压引流,33 例行常压引流。比较三组早期及随访结果。[结果]所有患者均顺利完成手术,三组手术时间、术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),持续负压组第 1 d 和术后总引流量,以及引流管留置时间显著大于其他两组(P<0.05);常压组伤口敷料渗血次数显著多于其他两组(P<0.05)。随时间推移。三组患者腿痛 VAS 评分、ODI 评分、JOA 评分均显著改善(P<0.05),相应时间点,三组间上述评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]多节段 TLIF 术后采用间断负压引流可以明显减少引流量和伤口渗血,缩短引流时间,是一种安全有效的方式。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of three drainage methods after multi-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). [Methods] From July 2019 to June 2020, a total of 104 patients who were undergoing TLIF for multilevel lumbar degenerative diseases in our department were divided into 3 group. After TLIF, 34 patients had intermittent negative pressure drainage (INPD), 37 pa- tients received continuous negative pressure drainage (CNPD), while the remaining 33 patients were treated by natural pressure drainage (NPD). The perioperative and follow-up data of the three groups were compared. [Results] All the patients in the 3 groups had TLIF per- formed smoothly. Although there were no significant differences in operative time and intraoperative blood loss among three groups (P>0.05), the CNPD group proved significantly greater than the INPD and NPD groups in terms of drainage volume at the 1st postoperative day, total vol- ume of postoperative drainage and total drainage days (P<0.05). However, the NPD group had significantly greater incision errhysis than the INPD and CNPD groups (P<0.05). The VAS of leg pain and ODI significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the JOA scores significantly in- creased over time postoperatively in all the 3 groups (P<0.05), whereas which proved not statistically significantly among the 3 groups at any corresponding time points (P>0.05). [Conclusion]The intermittent negative pressure drainage after multilevel TLIF does significantly re- duce the drainage volume, reduce postoperative wound bleeding, and shorten total drainage days, is a safe and effective drainage method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张姗姗,杨长伟,施水潮,等. 多节段经椎间孔椎体间融合三种引流方式比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31 (9): 855-858. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.09.18.
ZHANG Shan- shan, YANG Chang-wei, SHI Shui-chao, et al. Comparison of three drainage methods after multi-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2023, 31 (9): 855-858. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.09.18.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:August 04,2022
  • 最后修改日期:November 25,2022
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: May 25,2023
  • 出版日期: