NICE结固定锁骨中段骨折的生物力学研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

范振环,临床医学研究生在读,研究方向:创伤骨科,(电话)15553583179,(电子信箱)Fanzh0805@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.41

基金项目:


Biomechanical test of NICE knot fixation for mid- shaft clavicle fracture
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]探讨 NICE 结固定锁骨中段骨折的生物力学特性。[方法]将 60 例人体锁骨标本随机分为 4 组,使用骨科摆锯制作锁骨中段骨折 (OTA /AO 分型 15-A2) 模型,分别行拉力螺钉固定,以及 2-0 线 NICE 结固定、1-0 线 NICE 结固定和 1#线 NICE 结固定。采用 Instron 生物力学测试机进行三点弯曲实验,测量各组不同固定方式骨折模型的失效载荷、最大位移及屈服刚度。[结果]1#线 NICE 组与拉力螺钉组在失效载荷 [(98.4±0.7)N vs (99.0±1.7)N, P>0.05]、最大位移 [(10.1±0.4)mm vs (10.0± 0.4)mm, P>0.05], 以及屈服刚度 [(24.4±0.4)N/mm vs (24.5±0.5)N/mm, P>0.05] 差异无统计学意义。拉力螺钉组在失效载荷 [(99.0± 1.7)N, (45.2±0.5)N, (64.8±0.7)N, P<0.05]、最大位移 [(10.0±0.4)mm, (9.4±0.6)mm, (5.6±0.5)mm, P<0.05] 及屈服刚度 [(24.5±0.5)N/mm, (5.0±0.3)N/mm, (12.5±0.3)N/mm, P<0.05] 均显著大于 2-0 线 NICE 组和 1-0 线 NICE 组。1-0 线 NICE 组失效载荷 [(64.8±0.7)N vs (45.2±0.5)N, P<0.05]、屈服刚度 [(12.5±0.3)N/mm vs (5.0±0.3)N/mm, P<0.05] 均显著大于 2-0 线 NICE 组,而前者的最大位移 [(5.6± 0.5)mm vs (9.4±0.6)mm, P<0.05] 显著小于后者。[结论]使用 1#线进行 NICE 结环绕捆扎固定锁骨中段骨折,与使用拉力螺钉固定方式的生物力学性能相当。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the biomechanical properties of NICE knot fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fracture. [Methods] A total of 60 human clavicle specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups. The mid-shaft clavicle fracture models (OTA /AO type 15-A2) were made with an oscillating saw. After that, the fracture was fixed with lag screw, 2-0 suture NICE knot, 1-0 suture NICE knot and 1# su- ture NICE knot, respectively. Failure load, maximum displacement and yield stiffness of fracture models were measured by Instron biome- chanical machine. [Results] There were no significant differences between the lag screw group and 1 # suture NICE knot group in terms of failure load [(98.4±0.7)N vs (99.0±1.7)N, P>0.05], the maximal displacement [(10.1±0.4)mm vs (10.0±0.4)mm, P<0.05] and yield stiffness [(24.4±0.4)N/mm vs (24.5±0.5)N/mm, P>0.05]. However, the lag screw proved significantly superior to 2-0 suture NICE group and 1-0 su- ture NICE group in terms of the failure load [(99.0±1.7)N vs (45.2±0.5)N and (64.8±0.7)N, P<0.05], the maximal displacement [(10.0±0.4) mm vs (9.4±0.6)mm and (5.6±0.5)mm, P<0.05] and yield stiffness [(24.5±0.5)N/mm vs (5.0±0.3)N/mm and (12.5±0.3)N/mm, P<0.05]. In ad- dition, the 1-0 suture group was significantly superior to the 2-0 suture NICE group regarding failure load [(64.8±0.7)N vs (45.2±0.5)N, P< 0.05] and yield stiffness [(12.5±0.3)N/mm vs (5.0±0.3)N/mm, P<0.05], despite that the former had significantly less maximum displacement than the latter [(5.6±0.5)mm vs (9.4±0.6)mm, P<0.05]. [Conclusion] The biomechanical performance of NICE knot with 1# suture for fixa- tion of mid-shaft clavicle fractures is comparable to that of lag screw fixation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

范振环,于振海,赵廷宝,等. NICE结固定锁骨中段骨折的生物力学研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31 (10): 912-916. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.10.10.
FAN Zhen- huan, YU Zhen- hai, ZHAO Tingbao, et al. Biomechanical test of NICE knot fixation for mid- shaft clavicle fracture[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2023, 31 (10): 912-916. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.10.10.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:December 01,2022
  • 最后修改日期:March 28,2023
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: May 24,2023
  • 出版日期: