全膝置换术是否留置引流管对康复的影响△(开放获取)
作者:
作者单位:

复旦大学附属中山医院康复医学科,上海 200032

作者简介:

钟宗烨,主管治疗师,研究方向:骨科康复,(电子信箱)zhong.zongye@zs-hospital.sh.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687.4

基金项目:

上海市临床重点专科项目(编号:shslczdzk02703);上海中西医结合康复医学研究所项目(编号:2023XKPT26-RC1)


(Open Access) Impact of indwelling drainage on rehabilitation in total knee arthroplasty
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fu⁃dan University, Shanghai 200032 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较全膝置换术(total knee arthroplasty, TKA) 后是否留置引流管对膝骨关节炎患者膝功能康复的影响。[方法] 回顾性分析2019 年7 月—2023 年1 月于本院接受TKA 的130 例膝骨关节炎患者的临床资料。根据医患沟通结果,65 例患者未放置引流管,另外65 例放置引流管。比较两组患者围手术期和随访结果。[结果] 全部患者均顺利完成手术,无引流组在总失血量[(340.8±101.5) ml vs (389.2±80.8) ml, P=0.049]、术后住院时间[(2.0±0.7) d vs (4.4±0.9) d, P<0.001] 显著少于引流组。两组术后并发症发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随时间推移,两组患者疼痛VAS 评分均显著减少(P<0.05),膝伸屈ROM、AKSS 功能评分均显著增加(P<0.05)。术后1 个月,无引流组的VAS 评分[(1.7±0.7) vs (2.7±1.0), P=0.002]、膝伸屈ROM[(119.8±4.1)° vs (116.3±6.6)°, P<0.001] 显著优于引流组。[结论] 相比留置引流管,全膝置换术后无引流管具有减轻患者术后近期疼痛,缩短住院时间的优势。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical consequences of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis (KO) with or with-out indwelling drainage tube. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 130 patients who received TKA for KO in our hospital fromJuly 2019 to January 2023. According to the results of doctor-patient communication, 65 patients had not drainage placed (the ND group) ,whereas other 65 patients had drainage placed (the D group). The documents regarding to perioperative period and follow-up were comparedbetween the two groups. [Results] All patients in both groups had TKA performed successfully. The ND group proved significantly superiorto the D group in terms of total blood loss [(340.8±101.5) ml vs (389.2±80.8) ml, P=0.049] and postoperative hospital stay [(2.0±0.7) days vs(4.4±0.9) days, P<0.001], although there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the twogroups (P>0.05). As time went on, the pain VAS scores significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the knee flexion-extension range of motion(ROM) and AKSS scores significantly increased in both groups (P<0.05). The ND group proved significantly better than the D group in termsVAS score [(1.7±0.7) vs (2.7±1.0), P=0.002], the knee ROM [DHS (119.8±4.1)° vs (116.3±6.6)°, P<0.001] 1 month postoperatively. [Conclu-sion] Compared with indwelling drainage, no indwelling drainage after total knee arthroplasty has the advantages of reducing short-term post-operative pain and shortening hospital stay.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

钟宗烨,刘邦忠,张键,等. 全膝置换术是否留置引流管对康复的影响△(开放获取)[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32 (23): 2196-2199. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100467.
ZHONG Zong-ye, LIU Bang-zhong, ZHANG Jian, et al. (Open Access) Impact of indwelling drainage on rehabilitation in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2024, 32 (23): 2196-2199. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.100467.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:July 03,2023
  • 最后修改日期:June 21,2024
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: December 04,2024
  • 出版日期: