认知行为干预对腰椎退行性疾病术后恐动症的作用
作者:
作者单位:

苏州大学附属第一医院骨科,江苏苏州 215000

作者简介:

陈培倩,主管护师,研究方向:骨科手术后护理,(电子信箱)chengpq199307@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R681.5

基金项目:


Effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on kinesophobia after posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerativediseases
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Orthopedics,The First Affiliated Hospital,Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215000 ,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探讨认知行为干预对腰椎后路椎间融合术(posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF) 治疗的腰椎退行性疾病术后恐动症的干预效果。[方法] 2021 年1 月—2023 年1 月采用PLIF 治疗的腰椎退行性疾病,并患有恐动症的100 例患者纳入本研究,采用抛硬币法随机分为两组。其中,50 例在常规护理的基础上,给予认知行为干预,另外50 例仅给予术后常规护理。比较两组临床资料。[结果] 认知行为组卧床时间[(2.1±0.6) d vs (3.8±0.8), P<0.001]、住院时间[(7.2±1.1) d vs (8.5±1.3) d , P<0.001]、并发症总发生率(8% vs 24%, P=0.029) 均显著优于常规组。认知行为组恢复完全负重活动时间显著早于常规组[(45.3±4.9) d vs (53.8±6.6) d, P<0.001]。随时间推移,两组恐动症Tampa 评分(Tampa scale for kinesiophobia, TSK) 均显著下降(P<0.05),而JOA 评分均显著升高(P<0.05)。术后1 周和1 个月时,认知行为组的TSK 评分[(32.1±5.3) vs (44.8±6.6), P<0.001; (23.4±3.7) vs (30.4±4.7), P<0.001] 和JOA 评分[(20.6±3.5) vs (18.8±3.2), P<0.001; (22.4±3.0) vs (20.5±3.4), P<0.001] 均显著优于常规组。[结论] 认知行为干预能够促进腰椎退行性疾病术后恐动症早期康复,降低并发症发生率,促进功能康复。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on kinesophobia after posterior lumbar interbody fu-sion (PLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. [Methods] From January 2021 to January 2023, a total of 100 patients who underwent PLIF forlumbar degenerative diseases and suffered from postoperative kinesophobia were enrolled into this study. The patients were randomly divid-ed into two groups by coin toss method. Among them, 50 patients were given cognitive behavioral intervention on the basis of routine care,while the other 50 cases were only given postoperative routine care. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. [Results] The inter-vention group proved significantly superior to the routine group in terms of bed rest time [(2.1±0.6) days vs (3.8±0.8) days, P<0.001], hospitalstay [(7.2±1.1) days vs (8.5±1.3) days, P<0.001], and the total incidence of complications (8% vs 24%, P=0.029). In addition, the interven-tion group returned to full weight-bearing activities significantly earlier than the routine group [(45.3±4.9) days vs (53.8±6.6) days, P<0.001]. As time went on, Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK) significantly decreased (P<0.05), while JOA score significantly increased inboth groups (P<0.05). At 1 week and 1 month after surgery, the intervention group was significantly better than the routine group in terms ofTSK score [(32.1±5.3) vs (44.8±6.6), P<0.001; (23.4±3.7) vs (30.4±4.7), P<0.001] and JOA score [(20.6±3.5) vs (18.8±3.2), P<0.001; (22.4±3.0) vs (20.5±3.4), P<0.001]. [Conclusion] Cognitive behavioral intervention does promote early recovery of kinesophobia after PLIF forlumbar degenerative diseases, reduce the incidence of complications and promote functional rehabilitation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈培倩,韩丽萍. 认知行为干预对腰椎退行性疾病术后恐动症的作用[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2025, 33 (5): 473-476. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.11059A-.
CHEN Pei- qian, HAN Li- ping. Effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on kinesophobia after posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerativediseases[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2025, 33 (5): 473-476. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.11059A-.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:August 15,2024
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: March 06,2025
  • 出版日期: