机器人辅助与常规经皮椎弓钉固定胸腰椎骨折比较(开放获取)
作者:
作者单位:

1.广东省中医院珠海医院,广东珠海 519015 ;2.中山市中医院,广东中山 528400 ;3.广州中医药大学第二临床医学院,广东广州 510405

作者简介:

刘万鹏,主治医师,研究方向:脊柱退变与创伤的微创外科治疗,(电子信箱)lwptcm@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.2

基金项目:

珠海市医学科研基金项目(编号:2220009000282);广东省第四批名中医师承项目(编号:粤中医办函[2023]108 号)


Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus conventional counterpart for thoracolumbar fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Zhuhai Hospital,Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai 519015 , Guangdong, China ; 2.Zhongshan Hospital of TraditionalChinese Medicine, Zhongshan 528400 , Guangdong, China ; 3.Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405 , Guangdong, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]比较机器人辅助与常规经皮椎弓根螺钉固定(percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, PPSF)联合伤椎植骨治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析 2022 年 1 月—2023 年 11 月本院采用经皮椎弓根螺钉固定联合伤椎植骨治疗胸腰椎骨折 72 例患者的临床资料,根据医患沟通结果,35 例采用机器人辅助 PPSF,37 例采用常规 PPSF。比较两组围手术期、随访及影像结果。[结果]两组均成功手术,无严重并发症。两组手术时间、切口长度、住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05), 机器人组术中透视次数 [次, (13.1±1.0) vs (35.8±4.4), P<0.001]、术中失血量 [mL, (64.7±37.4) vs (101.1±81.5), P<0.001]、切口愈合等级 [例, 甲/乙/丙, (35/0/0) vs (33/4/0), P<0.001] 均显著优于常规组。所有患者均获随访 1 年以上。机器人组下地行走时间 [d, (1.9±0.8) vs (2.7±0.9), P<0.001] 和完全负重活动时间 [d, (31.4±3.5) vs (44.8±3.0), P<0.001] 均显著早于常规组。随时间推移,两组 VAS 和 ODI 评分均显著下降(P<0.05)。术后 3 d 机器人组的 VAS 和 ODI 评分显著优于常规组(P<0.05),但术后 3 个月及末次随访时两组间上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,机器人组的 Badu 评级 [个, 0/1/2/3, (149/5/2/0) vs (150/12/4/4), P=0.016]、置钉 GRS 评级 [钉, A/B/C/D/E, (199/9/2/0/0) vs (190/29/1/2/0), P=0.002]、椎体空腔征 [例, 有/无, (4/31) vs (13/24), P=0.018]、植骨评分 [例, 0/1/2/3/4, (0/0/5/11/19) vs (0/3/12/14/8), P<0.001] 均优于常规组。末次随访时,机器人组局部后凸角 [°, (6.1±0.8) vs (7.3±0.9), P< 0.001]、伤椎前缘高度 [mm, (25.7±1.0) vs (24.6±2.3), P=0.011] 均优于常规组。[结论]机器人辅助微创置钉植骨治疗胸腰椎骨折可提高置钉准确率、有效矫正脊柱后凸、恢复椎体高度,并获得满意疗效。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) versus conventional freehand PPSF in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. [Methods] A retrospective research was conducted on 72 patients who received PPSF combined with vertebral body bone grafting for thoracolumbar fractures in our hospital from January 2022 to November 2023. According to the communication between doctors and patients, 35 patients were treated with robot-assisted PPSF, while other 37 patients were with conventional manual PPSF. The perioperative, follow-up, and imaging data of the two groups were compared. [Results] All patients in both groups had corresponding surgeries performed successfully without severe complications. There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, incision length, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05), but the robot-assisted group had significantly fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy [times, (13.1±1.0) vs (35.8±4.4), P<0.001], less intraoperative blood loss [mL, (64.7±37.4) vs (101.1±81.5), P<0.001], and better incision healing grades [cases, A/B/C, (35/0/0) vs (33/4/0), P<0.001] than the conventional group. All patients were followed up for more than one year, and the robot-assisted group regained ambulation [d, (1.9±0.8) vs (2.7±0.9), P<0.001] and full weight-bearing activity [d, (31.4±3.5) vs (44.8±3.0), P<0.001] significantly earlier than the conventional group. The VAS and ODI scores significantly decreased over time in both groups (P<0.05), which in the robot-assisted group were significantly better than the conventional group 3 days postoperatively (P<0.05), and became not statistically different between the two groups 3 months postoperatively and at the last followup (P>0.05). Regarding imaging, the robot-assisted group proved significantly superior to the conventional group in terms of Badu grade [0/1/2/3, (149/5/2/0) vs (150/12/4/4), P=0.016], GRS grade for screw placement [A/B/C/D/E, (199/9/2/0/0) vs (190/29/ 1/2/0), P=0.002], vertebral vacuum signs [cases, yes/no, (4/31) vs (13/24), P=0.018], and bone graft scale [cases, 0/1/2/3/4, (0/0/5/11/19) vs (0/3/12/14/8), P<0.001]. In addition, the robot-assisted group was also significantly better than the conventional group in terms of local kyphotic angles [°, (6.1±0.8) vs (7.3±0.9), P<0.001] and anterior vertebral height [mm, (25.7±1.0) vs (24.6±2.3), P=0.011] at the last followup. [Conclusion] The robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and bone grafting does improve screw placement accuracy, effectively correct local kyphotic deformity, restore vertebral height, and achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for thoracolumbar fractures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘万鹏,陈鉴权,陈文创,等. 机器人辅助与常规经皮椎弓钉固定胸腰椎骨折比较(开放获取)[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2025, 33 (23): 2120-2126. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.120035.
LIU Wan- peng, CHEN Jian- quan, CHEN Wen- chuang, et al. Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus conventional counterpart for thoracolumbar fractures[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2025, 33 (23): 2120-2126. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.120035.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:January 14,2025
  • 最后修改日期:July 30,2025
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: December 05,2025
  • 出版日期: