腰椎间盘突出症单侧双通道内镜术中是否缝合纤维环
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东省文登整骨医院脊柱脊髓科, 264400 ;2.山东威高骨科材料股份有限公司, 264400

作者简介:

刘彬,副主任医师,研究方向:脊柱脊髓,(电子信箱)wdzglb@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687.4

基金项目:

山东省医药卫生项目(编号:202204070548);山东省医学会“青年人才托举”工程项目(编号:鲁医会[2025]14 号)


Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation with or without annular suture
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Department of Spine and Spinal Cord, Wendeng Orthopedic Hospital of Shandong Province, Weihai 264400 , Shandong, China ; 2. Shandong Weigao Orthopedic Materials Co., Ltd., Weihai 264400 , Shandong, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较单侧双通道内镜(unilateral biportal endoscopic, UBE)髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herniation, LDH)是否缝合纤维环的临床结果。[方法] 2023年10月—2025年2月80例LDH患者纳入本研究,均行UBE髓核摘除术。依据医患沟通结果,36例UBE髓核摘除术后给予纤维环缝合;另外44例仅行UBE髓核摘除术,未缝合纤维环。比较两组围手术期与随访资料。[结果] 两组所有患者手术顺利完成,无严重并发症。缝合组手术时间[min,(66.7±11.3) vs (53.4±12.9),P=0.032]、出血量[mL,(56.6±19.1) vs (45.6±21.3),P=0.023]均显著多于未缝合组。所有患者均随访10个月以上,随时间推移,两组腰痛和下肢痛VAS评分以及ODI评分均显著下降(P<0.05)。相应时间点,两组间腰痛和下肢痛VAS评分以及ODI评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访过程中,缝合组无复发病例,未缝合组2例复发(复发率4.5%),经保守治疗症状改善,未行二次手术治疗。[结论] UBE髓核摘除术联合纤维环缝合治疗LDH,可闭合纤维环破口、有可能降低术后复发率,但会增加手术时间及出血量,临床需结合患者情况个体化选择。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with and without annular repair. [Methods] From October 2023 to February 2025, a total of 80 patients with LDH were included in this study and all underwent UBE discectomy. Based on doctor-patient communication, 36 patients received annular suture after UBE discectomy, while the remaining 44 patients only underwent UBE discectomy without annular suture. The perioperative and follow-up data of the two groups were compared. [Results] All patients in both groups had the consistent surgeries performed successfully without serious complications. The suture group consumed significantly higher operation time [min, (66.7±11.3) vs (53.4±12.9), P=0.032] and blood loss [mL, (56.6±19.1) vs (45.6±21.3), P=0.023] than the non-suture group. All patients were followed up for more than 10 months. The VAS scores for low back pain and leg pain, as well as the ODI score significantly decreased in both groups over time (P<0.05), whereas which proved not statistically significant between the two groups at any time points accordingly (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, no recurrence was observed in the suture group, while 2 cases (4.5%) recurred in the non-suture group, whose symptoms improved after conservative treatment without revision surgery. [Conclusion] UBE discectomy combined with annular suture for LDH can close the annular defect and potentially reduce the recurrence rate, but it increases the operation time and blood loss. Clinical decisions should be individualized based on patient conditions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘彬,张廷伟,周纪平,等. 腰椎间盘突出症单侧双通道内镜术中是否缝合纤维环[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2026, 34 (10): 953-957. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.120856.
LIU Bin, ZHANG Ting-wei, ZHOU Ji-ping, et al. Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation with or without annular suture[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2026, 34 (10): 953-957. DOI:10.20184/j. cnki. Issn1005-8478.120856.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:December 31,2025
  • 最后修改日期:March 23,2026
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: May 21,2026
  • 出版日期: